PURE Reform

What is this?

This is the blog section of the PURE Reform website. Please leave your thoughts and comments here.

PURE Reform has created this blog as a forum for parents, teachers and community members to share information and voice concerns regrading the reform process in the Pittsburgh Public Schools. Although we would like to foster constructive dialogue, PURE Reform does not edit content. The views expressed by bloggers in this forum are not necessarily views held by PURE Reform.

To comment on an existing topic, go to the line at the bottom of the post for that topic that begins "Posted by..." That line will list "1 comment," "2 comments," etc. Click on "comments," then leave your comment in the box provided. To post as Anonymous, no registration is required, OR you can choose an identity.

To suggest a new topic, go to this month's post labeled "Start a New Post" and add your comment (as described above) about the new suggested topic. PURE Reform will use these comments to start new posts.

Links

  • PURE Reform website
  • PPS website

Blog Archive

  • ►  2018 (15)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2017 (48)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2016 (58)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2015 (95)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2014 (152)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2013 (136)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ▼  2012 (283)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (27)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (30)
    • ▼  April (27)
      • Competing slates for PFT positions
      • PFT sticks with senority
      • More infrastructure problems
      • Training our government officials of the future
      • Board director constituent meeting tonight
      • School District of Philadelphia to dissolve
      • Board seeks alternative to seniority for teacher f...
      • Proposal to accept bids for Schenley rejected
      • Principal appointments
      • One in two new college graduates are jobless or un...
      • Opportunity to meet with newest Board member, Dr. ...
      • Putting a number on teachers' value
      • Robo Graders
      • Teacher evaluation
      • PPS considers buying 6000 ipads
      • Gun found outside Perry
      • Still too many schools?
      • Trying to sell Schenley again
      • I Pad purchases
      • Reaction to earlier start times
      • Teachers displaced
      • Pittsburgh still not cleared
      • Take a Father to School Day receives national reco...
      • Cuts to special ed
      • Public Source article on the Pittsburgh Promise
      • Changes in school starting times
      • Allocation of state funds among school districts
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (36)
  • ►  2011 (351)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (33)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (28)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (32)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2010 (281)
    • ►  December (29)
    • ►  November (33)
    • ►  October (36)
    • ►  September (30)
    • ►  August (38)
    • ►  July (26)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (17)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2009 (309)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (28)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (27)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (32)
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (37)
  • ►  2008 (83)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Putting a number on teachers' value

From the PG:

http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/news/education/changing-the-classroom-putting-a-number-on-teachers-value-not-an-easy-task-632701/
Posted by Questioner at 10:31 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)