This is the blog section of the PURE Reform website. Please leave your thoughts and comments here.
PURE Reform has created this blog as a forum for parents, teachers and community members to share information and voice concerns regrading the reform process in the Pittsburgh Public Schools. Although we would like to foster constructive dialogue, PURE Reform does not edit content. The views expressed by bloggers in this forum are not necessarily views held by PURE Reform.
To comment on an existing topic, go to the line at the bottom of the post for that topic that begins "Posted by..." That line will list "1 comment," "2 comments," etc. Click on "comments," then leave your comment in the box provided. To post as Anonymous, no registration is required, OR you can choose an identity.
To suggest a new topic, go to this month's post labeled "Start a New Post" and add your comment (as described above) about the new suggested topic. PURE Reform will use these comments to start new posts.
The Richmond petition is so to the point. What is most frustrating about the pps TFA proposal is that like so many other ideas/plans it feel like there is some deadline and the rush is on. Is it the M.O. to leave so little time to have everyone consider all aspects of a plan to get things through that have the appropriate backing? It sometimes feels like we and our children are experiments used to build careers and resumes.
Education in Pittsburgh has become an integral part of multiple schemes to freeload on uneducated taxpayers. The more uneducated and unprepared the rising generation is, all the more opportunity there is to perpetuate the freeload in this entrepreneurial schemata.
From the agenda review materials regarding TFA: *3 year contract hiring up to 30 teachers/year *cost of $5,000/teacher payable to TFA *salary and benefits from PPS *TFA is a non-profit *teachers for secondary science, math, social studies, and foreign language *from the supplemental GATES fund *$750,000 total contract *TFA has dedicated, effective teachers with 2 year contracts
What is the supplemental GATES fund? What does this tell us? It is a done deal.
We don't have "effective" available teachers in ALL of these disciplines? We can't recruit without paying fees to a "non-profit" corporation?
Can the TFA teachers opt out after only 1 year? What is our guarantee?
This is just another PPS experiment while paying out more monies to corporate America.
It was reported at the Public Hearing that there are 1,341 people who signed the petition against Teach for America.
Also, the cash in hand sale of Burgwin, to be voted on tomorrow, is 475,000 to the Hazelwood Initiative who plans to put a Propel school in the building.
7 comments:
In Richmond there is also a petition re: TFA:
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/richmond-public-schools
Link to the petition (would have been helpful for the PG to include it or specific info on how to reach it):
http://www.change.org/petitions/pittsburgh-public-schools-superintendent-linda-lane-wait-until-the-new-school-board-is-sworn-in-to-vote-on-important-issues-facing-our-schools?share_id=sQgBEEmTuM&utm_campaign=share_button_action_box&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=share_petition
The Richmond petition is so to the point. What is most frustrating about the pps TFA proposal is that like so many other ideas/plans it feel like there is some deadline and the rush is on. Is it the M.O. to leave so little time to have everyone consider all aspects of a plan to get things through that have the appropriate backing? It sometimes feels like we and our children are experiments used to build careers and resumes.
Education in Pittsburgh has become an integral part of multiple schemes to freeload on uneducated taxpayers. The more uneducated and unprepared the rising generation is, all the more opportunity there is to perpetuate the freeload in this entrepreneurial schemata.
From the agenda review materials regarding TFA:
*3 year contract hiring up to 30 teachers/year
*cost of $5,000/teacher payable to TFA
*salary and benefits from PPS
*TFA is a non-profit
*teachers for secondary science, math, social studies, and foreign language
*from the supplemental GATES fund
*$750,000 total contract
*TFA has dedicated, effective teachers with 2 year contracts
What is the supplemental GATES fund? What does this tell us? It is a done deal.
We don't have "effective" available teachers in ALL of these disciplines? We can't recruit without paying fees to a "non-profit" corporation?
Can the TFA teachers opt out after only 1 year? What is our guarantee?
This is just another PPS experiment while paying out more monies to corporate America.
"TFA has dedicated, effective teachers with 2 year contracts"
how has their effectiveness been tested thus far?
Councilwoman Rudiak posted the following to her fb recently:
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" Albert Einstein (found on a poster at CMU)
I think that is where the skills needed to be a good teacher come in. I don't know that pps is in a position to experiment at this time.
It was reported at the Public Hearing that there are 1,341 people who signed the petition against Teach for America.
Also, the cash in hand sale of Burgwin, to be voted on tomorrow, is 475,000 to the Hazelwood Initiative who plans to put a Propel school in the building.
Post a Comment