The district's report to the Education Committee states that
"In 2006-2007 the District made modest growth in student achievement."
"In 2007-2008 the District made substantial progress across the board."
"In 2008-2009 the District continued to make substantial progress in student achievement at almost all grade levels."
Overall, the impression is that substantial progress was made over the past 3 years, but how well does the data support these claims?
In reading from 2005-2006 to 2008-2009 the change in proficiency was:
Grade 3 51.3% to 62.3%
Grade 4 54.6% to 56.2% Less than 2 percentage point increase
Grade 5 47.6% to 52.1%
Grade 6 51.2% to 47% Decrease
Grade 7 53.6% tp 54.8% Less than 2 percentage point increase
Grade 8 58.3% to 71.4%
Grade 11 51.5% to 50.7% Decrease
So, while progress in reading in three grades over the last three years truly does seem to be "substantial," it is difficult to see how progress in the other four grades can be considered "substantial."
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Here are the results for progress in math proficiency between 2005-06 and 2008-09:
Grade 3 71.5% to 71.7% Less than 2 point increase
Grade 4 71.1% to 70.7% Decrease
Grade 5 58.6% to 63.4%
Grade 6 51.7% to 61.7%
Grade 7 52.0% to 61.4%
Grade 8 47.7% to 59.4%
Grade 11 40.4% to 43.3% Less than 3 point increase
Four grades have truly substantial gains, while three do not.
Post a Comment